Overview
At a glance
- Consciousness as recursive self-observation
- UEF parameters: entropy, integration, temporal binding
- Three testable predictions (TMS-EEG, working memory)
- Saturation dynamics and phase transitions
- Opens the philosophical trilogy
The trilogy opener models consciousness as the recursive self-observation of a Universal Energy Field (UEF) across scales, with a mathematical formalization quantifying conscious expression through defined parameters.
Consciousness is parameterized through information entropy, integration capacity, temporal binding, boundary conditions, and scaling functions, drawing on quantum field theory, complex-systems theory, and information theory to model saturation dynamics and phase transitions in recursive systems. The paper states three specific, testable predictions: that neural systems with higher boundary-function values show increased perturbational complexity in TMS-EEG studies; that temporal-binding decay constants correlate with working-memory persistence; and that systems near saturation exhibit critical slowing down before threshold transitions.
The paper argues the framework addresses standing problems in consciousness theory — the hard problem, the combination problem, scale-dependent recognition — and reads recent superradiant phase-transition results as consonant with its saturation-driven model. It is offered in the spirit of open theoretical development and independent scholarship.
What it claims / What it does not claim
What it claims
A parameterized theory of consciousness. Consciousness modeled as recursive self-observation of the UEF, quantified through entropy, integration, temporal binding, boundary conditions, and scaling — with the paper arguing this reframes the hard and combination problems.
Testable predictions. Three concrete, empirically checkable predictions in TMS-EEG perturbational complexity, working-memory persistence, and critical slowing down near thresholds.
What it does not claim
A measurement problem, acknowledged. The paper flags that a consciousness-primary theory is hard to validate through empirical methods that presuppose material primacy, and that genuine recursive self-observation is not yet cleanly distinguished from complex but non-conscious feedback.
Consonance, not confirmation. The superradiant results are read as support for the phase-transition model rather than confirmation of the theory, and the broader cosmological reading is marked by the paper as speculative.
Figures
